Fears of an ‘October surprise’

McCain adviser may have struck a nerve

Candidate distances himself from terror comment, but does it ring true?

 

 

Sen. Barack Obama and his surrogates continued to criticize Charles R. Black Jr., a top adviser to Sen. John McCain, on Tuesday for saying a terrorist attack before the November election would help the presumptive Republican nominee. But behind their protests lay a question that has dogged Democrats since Sept. 11, 2001: Was Black speaking the truth?

“I don’t think anyone knows the answer to this question,” said Tad Devine, a senior strategist on Sen. John F. Kerry’s 2004 presidential campaign, which confronted the same internal debate. “On the one hand, Republicans say they made America safe. That argument goes by the wayside if there’s an attack. On the other hand, an attack would change the entire framework of this election.”

Black’s comment to Fortune magazine that a terrorist attack “certainly would be a big advantage” roiled the presidential campaign for a second straight day. Obama — who has made a determined effort to shore up his credentials on national security since clinching the Democratic nomination, arguing that the United States is less safe now than before President Bush took office — wasted no time in trying to counter Black’s statement. Obama dispatched Richard Ben-Veniste, a member of the bipartisan 9/11 Commission, to hold a conference call with reporters in which he called Black’s comments “a candid and very disappointing glimpse into the thinking of one of McCain’s closest advisers.” He did not directly call for Black to step aside.

 

Rest of Washington Post article here…

One thought on “Fears of an ‘October surprise’

  1. My issue with this is two-fold. First of all – why would having a terrorist attack be something to be discussed in being beneficial to anyone – much less in an election.

    And two, what do you mean this has been discussed in private?

    Really?

    And why is Obama using people from the 9/11 Commission (which, for some reason is noted in this Post article as “bipartisan”…..as if it needed to be noted as such). I’ve read the 9/11 Commission’s report…..and it’s completely INcomplete, in every way. And it’s been noted that the Commission’s head is close with Condelezza Rice – I mean come on……

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s